validation error

WARNING: This website is obsolete! Please follow this link to get to the new Albert@Home website!

Author	Message
Stephan Volkmann Send message Joined: 5 Jun 12 Posts: 4 Credit: 169,531 RAC: 0	Message 112110 - Posted: 11 Jun 2012, 19:48:48 UTC p2030.20111007.G63.99-00.28.C.b6s0g0.00000_1888 what happens with this WU? ID: 112110 · Reply Quote

Saenger Send message Joined: 15 Feb 05 Posts: 361 Credit: 600,993 RAC: 0	Message 112132 - Posted: 18 Jul 2012, 4:29:57 UTC A link would be fine, how should it be found otherwise? I've got a question about this ones: p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0.00000_2968 p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0.00000_3784 p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0.00000_3016 p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0.00000_3528 All have lots of validate errors, and will probably never be validated if it goes on like that. What's the problem with those buggers? GrÃ¼ÃŸe vom SÃ¤nger ID: 112132 · Reply Quote

Saenger Send message Joined: 15 Feb 05 Posts: 361 Credit: 600,993 RAC: 0	Message 112133 - Posted: 19 Jul 2012, 16:12:15 UTC And another one: p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0.00000_3752_4 Anyone of the team aware of the problem? GrÃ¼ÃŸe vom SÃ¤nger ID: 112133 · Reply Quote

Saenger Send message Joined: 15 Feb 05 Posts: 361 Credit: 600,993 RAC: 0	Message 112134 - Posted: 19 Jul 2012, 17:44:34 UTC And here's one, where I'm the culprit, who got the "Completed, waiting for validation"-tag, while others are already "Validate error": p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0.00000_2912 GrÃ¼ÃŸe vom SÃ¤nger ID: 112134 · Reply Quote

mikey Send message Joined: 22 Jan 05 Posts: 15 Credit: 4,300,874 RAC: 0	Message 112137 - Posted: 20 Jul 2012, 11:21:39 UTC Last modified: 20 Jul 2012, 11:21:59 UTC I have a WHOLE BUNCH of "validate errors" in the last couple of days too! http://albert.phys.uwm.edu/result.php?resultid=261951 http://albert.phys.uwm.edu/result.php?resultid=261921 http://albert.phys.uwm.edu/result.php?resultid=261903 http://albert.phys.uwm.edu/result.php?resultid=261887 etc, etc! ID: 112137 · Reply Quote

Saenger Send message Joined: 15 Feb 05 Posts: 361 Credit: 600,993 RAC: 0	Message 112142 - Posted: 23 Jul 2012, 20:14:34 UTC This one has reached 20 tasks, so it will be invalidated automatically after the next ones comes in: p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0.00000_3640 1 waiting for validation (that's me) 1 DL error 1 Abortion by user 1 in progress 16 validate errors Something completely fucked up with either the validator or lots of WUs. GrÃ¼ÃŸe vom SÃ¤nger ID: 112142 · Reply Quote

tullio Send message Joined: 22 Jan 05 Posts: 796 Credit: 137,342 RAC: 0	Message 112143 - Posted: 24 Jul 2012, 8:25:19 UTC So far I got no validation error on my Linux box (no GPU) in Albert@home while I got some in gamma-ray pulsar search in Einstein@home. Tullio ID: 112143 · Reply Quote

Saenger Send message Joined: 15 Feb 05 Posts: 361 Credit: 600,993 RAC: 0	Message 112144 - Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 17:20:49 UTC Anyone at home from the project? GrÃ¼ÃŸe vom SÃ¤nger ID: 112144 · Reply Quote

Bernd Machenschalk Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 15 Oct 04 Posts: 1956 Credit: 6,218,130 RAC: 0	Message 112149 - Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 5:48:54 UTC Apparently one of the 'broken beams' (broken Arecibo data) we had on Einstein slipped through to the workunit generator here. I'm afraid I can't do anything else than just cancel the remaining workunits from that beam ("p2030.20111005.G64.25-00.28.N.b6s0g0"). We're still thinking on how to prevent this in the future. BM ID: 112149 · Reply Quote

tullio Send message Joined: 22 Jan 05 Posts: 796 Credit: 137,342 RAC: 0	Message 112150 - Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 7:38:07 UTC All LAT tasks fail after 22 minutes. Tullio ID: 112150 · Reply Quote

tullio Send message Joined: 22 Jan 05 Posts: 796 Credit: 137,342 RAC: 0	Message 112151 - Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 10:30:24 UTC - in response to Message 112150. I have put NNT. Tullio ID: 112151 · Reply Quote

Bernd Machenschalk Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 15 Oct 04 Posts: 1956 Credit: 6,218,130 RAC: 0	Message 112153 - Posted: 1 Aug 2012, 11:09:41 UTC - in response to Message 112150. All LAT tasks fail after 22 minutes. Tullio There was a serious bug in the Linux App that made the program crash when writing a checkpoint. Should be fixed with the new version 27 out yesterday. BM ID: 112153 · Reply Quote

tullio Send message Joined: 22 Jan 05 Posts: 796 Credit: 137,342 RAC: 0	Message 112155 - Posted: 1 Aug 2012, 18:40:19 UTC - in response to Message 112153. Looks like it works now, thanks. ID: 112155 · Reply Quote