WARNING: This website is obsolete! Please follow this link to get to the new Albert@Home website!
GW S6 LineVeto search v1.11 (SSE2) errors |
Message boards :
Problems and Bug Reports :
GW S6 LineVeto search v1.11 (SSE2) errors
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 14 Jan 12 Posts: 13 Credit: 282,604 RAC: 0 |
Hi, I am getting a lot of validate errors for these tasks on ALL my machines. Windows and linux. I know, this is a test project, but other tasks seem to run fine. |
Alex Send message Joined: 1 Mar 05 Posts: 88 Credit: 398,734 RAC: 0 |
you can find the answer here: http://albert.phys.uwm.edu/forum_thread.php?id=8888&nowrap=true#112065 |
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 14 Jan 12 Posts: 13 Credit: 282,604 RAC: 0 |
Thanks, Alex! |
Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein) Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 28 Aug 06 Posts: 1483 Credit: 1,864,017 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for reporting this. To be honest, the experiments with validator settings were NOT supposed to have an effect on the GW search. We will check on Monday if there is a problem with he S6LV1 validation process. Cheers HB |
Bernd Machenschalk Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 15 Oct 04 Posts: 1956 Credit: 6,218,130 RAC: 0 |
On Albert we ran several test for S6LV1, such that apparently the workunit generator, application binaries and validator got a bit out of sync. Sorry. As S6LV1 jobs from Albert aren't needed anymore, I canceled the remaining workunits that had no jobs in progress already last week. I now disabled some checks in the validator such that people should get credit for the remaining S6LV1 jobs. BM |
Bernd Machenschalk Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 15 Oct 04 Posts: 1956 Credit: 6,218,130 RAC: 0 |
I also canceled the S6LV1 WUs that had unsent results - it doesn't make sense to waste CPU computing time on these. BM |