WARNING: This website is obsolete! Please follow this link to get to the new Albert@Home website!
[New release] BRP app v1.22 feedback thread |
Message boards :
Problems and Bug Reports :
[New release] BRP app v1.22 feedback thread
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Oliver Behnke Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 4 Sep 07 Posts: 130 Credit: 8,545,955 RAC: 0 |
Hi, We just released BRP4 v1.22 which adds a number of improvements. Notes: * OpenCL GPU memory requirements reduced by 128 MB (to ~360 MB) * Dropped support for OpenCL 1.0 GPUs (in favor of the above, OpenCL 1.0 only GPUs like the Radeon 4xxx are too slow anyway) * More graceful OpenCL memory error handling * Known issue: no OpenCL support for Mac OS X for the time being (we're looking into a potential Apple bug, no pun intended) * CUDA apps are enabled again for the time being * Input data download volume (per work unit) can be reduced by a factor of two (soon) * Please use the latest Catalyst driver (>=12.1) and BOINC client (>=7.0.12). Let's try and collect your feedback to this specific release (and this one only) in this thread. Thanks, Oliver |
mickydl* Send message Joined: 8 Dec 11 Posts: 6 Credit: 6,000 RAC: 0 |
Just to be sure: By "latest Catalyst driver (>=12.1)" you mean "AMD Catalystâ„¢ 11.11 - Revision number 12.1" ? I can't find any Catalyst 12.1 for Linux on the AMD site. mickydl* |
Trog Dog Send message Joined: 25 Nov 05 Posts: 204 Credit: 64,008 RAC: 0 |
the one available from here http://www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/amd-driver-installer-12.1-x86.x86_64.run |
skildude Send message Joined: 15 Nov 11 Posts: 9 Credit: 103,497 RAC: 0 |
should we dump Wu's still using the 1.21 app? I've noticed a few inconclusives and errors on that app. not seeing any problems from other GPU projects |
Oliver Behnke Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 4 Sep 07 Posts: 130 Credit: 8,545,955 RAC: 0 |
Just to be sure: By "latest Catalyst driver (>=12.1)" you mean "AMD Catalystâ„¢ 11.11 - Revision number 12.1" ? That's just because of AMD's sloppy web editing. The one you found is the 12.1 driver. Oliver |
Oliver Behnke Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 4 Sep 07 Posts: 130 Credit: 8,545,955 RAC: 0 |
should we dump Wu's still using the 1.21 app? I've noticed a few inconclusives and errors on that app. not seeing any problems from other GPU projects Depends on what errors you saw. If they are memory-related you probably want to reset your project. You'll be resent the same tasks but they'll be crunched with the latest app version which required less memory (OpenCL only). Cheers, Oliver |
pragmatic prancing periodic problem child, left Send message Joined: 26 Jan 05 Posts: 1639 Credit: 70,000 RAC: 0 |
Task comes in with <rsc_fpops_est>300000000000000.000000</rsc_fpops_est> which tells BOINC the task is going to take 210 hours and a bit, so BOINC will run it for a long time in panic mode. Can we please get a reasonable fpops estimate, one that doesn't immediately throw Albert tasks in High Priority? Jord. BOINC FAQ Service They say most of your brain shuts down in cryo-sleep. All but the primitive side, the animal side. No wonder I'm still awake. |
spingadus[MM] Send message Joined: 15 Oct 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 250,000 RAC: 0 |
Are there actually tasks available? I'm not receiving anything for my GPU. HD 6970 BOINC 7.0.18 ATI Driver 12.1 16459 Albert@Home 2/28/2012 6:15:47 PM update requested by user 16460 Albert@Home 2/28/2012 6:15:48 PM Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 16461 Albert@Home 2/28/2012 6:15:48 PM Requesting new tasks for ATI 16462 Albert@Home 2/28/2012 6:15:51 PM Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 16463 Albert@Home 2/28/2012 6:15:51 PM No tasks sent I've even suspended all tasks before trying to update. |
skildude Send message Joined: 15 Nov 11 Posts: 9 Credit: 103,497 RAC: 0 |
you have to leave a cpu free otherwise it's unlikely to get work. |
spingadus[MM] Send message Joined: 15 Oct 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 250,000 RAC: 0 |
Freed up 2 threads out of 8 and still nothing. Still no work. I'm currently running Moo! so I suspended the project as well. No tasks. |
Oliver Behnke Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 4 Sep 07 Posts: 130 Credit: 8,545,955 RAC: 0 |
Are there actually tasks available? I'm not receiving anything for my GPU. Yes there are and your config looks fine so far. Please have a look at the BOINC event log: did BOINC recognize your AMD GPU as OpenCL device? According to our logs it doesn't seem to be the case. You might need to reinstall the Catalyst driver. Also, remember to start the X server and make sure that BOINC can access the X display. If "clinfo" exists on your system you may use it to verify that your GPU is properly enumerated by OpenCL. Cheers, Oliver |
spingadus[MM] Send message Joined: 15 Oct 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 250,000 RAC: 0 |
No X windows here, I'm running win7. Is there somewhere in the logs that will show me if the card is enumerated correctly? I re-installed the 12.1 driver yesterday and did a custom install instead of express. Everything appeared to be checked. Its 2am here and I'm sleep typing, so I'll check when I wake up. :P |
Oliver Behnke Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 4 Sep 07 Posts: 130 Credit: 8,545,955 RAC: 0 |
No X windows here, I'm running win7 Oops, sorry :-) When you start the BOINC client it'll list all GPUs in the event log (advanced view). For AMD/ATI devices it might talk about CAL and OpenCL - we're interested only in the latter. You should find the list of GPUs more or less at the top of the event log, right before the registered projects are mentioned. Oliver |
mickydl* Send message Joined: 8 Dec 11 Posts: 6 Credit: 6,000 RAC: 0 |
My first OpenCL WU with the v1.22 app validated aigainst a CUDA result. No problem (see this Task). However, I believe that I am using an earlier version of Catalyst (< 12.1). I'll have to check that when I'm home from work. mickydl* |
oz Send message Joined: 28 Feb 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 1,285,478 RAC: 0 |
This happens in 7.0.18: The scheduler requests new jobs, and 3 seconds later it starts S6LV1. I can not imagine that the download of the task is completed then? Normally we can see something like this Started download of p2030.20111110.G39.19-00.79.N.b2s0g0.00000_3648.binary Finished download of p2030.20111110.G39.19-00.79.N.b2s0g0.00000_3648.binary first. 01-Mar-2012 08:39:39 [Albert@Home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 01-Mar-2012 08:39:39 [Albert@Home] Reporting 4 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU 01-Mar-2012 08:39:48 [Albert@Home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks 01-Mar-2012 08:39:48 [Albert@Home] Resent lost task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__39_S6LV1A_1 01-Mar-2012 08:39:51 [Albert@Home] Starting task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__39_S6LV1A_1 using einstein_S6LV1 version 110 (SSE2) in slot 10 01-Mar-2012 08:39:52 [Albert@Home] Computation for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__39_S6LV1A_1 finished 01-Mar-2012 08:39:52 [Albert@Home] Output file h1_0059.95_S6GC1__39_S6LV1A_1_0 for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__39_S6LV1A_1 absent 01-Mar-2012 08:41:39 [Albert@Home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 01-Mar-2012 08:41:39 [Albert@Home] Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU 01-Mar-2012 08:41:41 [Albert@Home] Scheduler request completed: got 4 new tasks 01-Mar-2012 08:41:43 [Albert@Home] Starting task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__35_S6LV1A_1 using einstein_S6LV1 version 110 (SSE2) in slot 10 01-Mar-2012 08:41:43 [Albert@Home] Starting task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__33_S6LV1A_1 using einstein_S6LV1 version 110 (SSE2) in slot 11 01-Mar-2012 08:41:43 [Albert@Home] Starting task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__34_S6LV1A_1 using einstein_S6LV1 version 110 (SSE2) in slot 12 01-Mar-2012 08:41:44 [Albert@Home] Computation for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__35_S6LV1A_1 finished 01-Mar-2012 08:41:44 [Albert@Home] Output file h1_0059.95_S6GC1__35_S6LV1A_1_0 for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__35_S6LV1A_1 absent 01-Mar-2012 08:41:44 [Albert@Home] Starting task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__36_S6LV1A_1 using einstein_S6LV1 version 110 (SSE2) in slot 10 01-Mar-2012 08:41:45 [Albert@Home] Computation for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__33_S6LV1A_1 finished 01-Mar-2012 08:41:45 [Albert@Home] Output file h1_0059.95_S6GC1__33_S6LV1A_1_0 for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__33_S6LV1A_1 absent 01-Mar-2012 08:41:46 [Albert@Home] Computation for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__34_S6LV1A_1 finished 01-Mar-2012 08:41:46 [Albert@Home] Output file h1_0059.95_S6GC1__34_S6LV1A_1_0 for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__34_S6LV1A_1 absent 01-Mar-2012 08:41:47 [Albert@Home] Computation for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__36_S6LV1A_1 finished 01-Mar-2012 08:41:47 [Albert@Home] Output file h1_0059.95_S6GC1__36_S6LV1A_1_0 for task h1_0059.95_S6GC1__36_S6LV1A_1 absent |
Oliver Behnke Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 4 Sep 07 Posts: 130 Credit: 8,545,955 RAC: 0 |
Well, S6LV1 tasks are not the same as BRP tasks. S6LV1 tasks re-use data already present on your host while BRP data is only used once, for a single WU. Looking at the error output of the failed S6LV1 task should tell us what happened. Please open another thread for that problem if it persists. This thread is meant to discuss BRP v1.22 only. Cheers, Oliver |
skildude Send message Joined: 15 Nov 11 Posts: 9 Credit: 103,497 RAC: 0 |
No X windows here, I'm running win7 He may need to uninstall the drivers, run driver sweep, then reinstall the 12.1 drivers. Leaving old drivers wreaks havoc on the OpenCL apps at Seti. Probably the same here. His Card is recognized as a 6900 series and he is running the 7.0.18 BOINC so that isn't a problem. Could running vbox be a problem? |
Oliver Behnke Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 4 Sep 07 Posts: 130 Credit: 8,545,955 RAC: 0 |
Don't know but could be if vbox acquires the GPU somehow... Oliver |
pragmatic prancing periodic problem child, left Send message Joined: 26 Jan 05 Posts: 1639 Credit: 70,000 RAC: 0 |
No it doesn't. No GPUs are being used on T4T or the Vboxwrapper test project (the only two projects at this time where VBox is being used), other than for showing graphics of sorts. And then these projects require Vbox 4.1.4 or higher, as far as I know. I'll go with driver corruption as well. It certainly never hurts to completely clean out previous drivers and then reinstall any later as new. Jord. BOINC FAQ Service They say most of your brain shuts down in cryo-sleep. All but the primitive side, the animal side. No wonder I'm still awake. |
pragmatic prancing periodic problem child, left Send message Joined: 26 Jan 05 Posts: 1639 Credit: 70,000 RAC: 0 |
Tasks still come in expecting to run for 205 hours. So I still have Albert tasks running in a panic. 03/03/2012 02:47:11 | Albert@Home | [rr_sim] Result p2030.20111110.G39.19-00.79.N.b3s0g0.00100_864_3 projected to miss deadline. 03/03/2012 02:47:11 | Albert@Home | [rr_sim] Project has 1 projected ATI deadline misses 03/03/2012 02:47:31 | Albert@Home | [rr_sim] p2030.20111110.G39.19-00.79.N.b3s0g0.00100_864_3 misses deadline by 614511.77 <time_stats> <on_frac>0.939516</on_frac> <connected_frac>0.783900</connected_frac> <active_frac>0.392607</active_frac> <gpu_active_frac>0.392447</gpu_active_frac> <last_update>1330725382.604116</last_update> </time_stats> Of course, it's because BOINC thinks that the 205 hours it's estimated to go do is really 205h / (39 / 100) = 525h (or almost 22 days). A tad difficult to do in 14 days. So it'll run from start to finish in high priority. And as we can see in here, DCF is no longer really used with Boinc 7. Not that it matters, DCF is 7.5, way too high to use reliably. So, pretty please, can the fpops estimate be adjusted enough that they don't come in thinking to take 200+ hours? Jord. BOINC FAQ Service They say most of your brain shuts down in cryo-sleep. All but the primitive side, the animal side. No wonder I'm still awake. |